A high privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the DeleteSysLogEntry function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL DELETE command allowing for reading the whole database and deleting entries in a non critical table. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality and some loss of integrity.

A high privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the _RemoveRequest function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL DELETE command allowing for reading the whole database and deleting entries in a non critical table. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality and some loss of integrity.

A high privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the dsgvo_contracts view due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

A high privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the accountstatus view devices parameter due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL UPDATE command allowing for reading the whole database and changing values in a non critical table. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality and some loss of integrity.

A high privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the accountstatus view userid parameter due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL UPDATE command allowing for reading the whole database and changing values in a non critical table. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality and some loss of integrity.

A high privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the DevSerialReset function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL UPDATE command allowing for reading the whole database and changing values in a non critical table. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality and some loss of integrity.

A high privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the DevSerialReset function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

A high privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the getAccountByID function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the sync_data24 task due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the _mb24confi_getDevice function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the getAlarmProfiles function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the mb24alarm.php files _mb24confi_getTagAlarm function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the _mb24api_getUserAccount function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the dataapi.php files _mb24confi_getTagAlarm function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

The Github Shortcode plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'repo' shortcode attribute in the 'github' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

The MetaMagic SEO Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the metamagic_update_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's SEO settings, including enabling or disabling the plugin and toggling description and keyword meta tag output via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WP Promoter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The LiteSpeed Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the /wp-json/litespeed/v1/notify_ccss and /wp-json/litespeed/v1/notify_ucss REST API endpoints in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. These endpoints accept CSS content from QUIC.cloud callback notifications and store it to disk without sanitization. The stored content is later rendered inline frontend page loads without output escaping. The access control protecting these endpoints is IP-based validation that can potentially be bypassed when the WordPress site is deployed behind a reverse proxy, load balancer, or CDN with certain configurations. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers, under certain conditions, to inject arbitrary JavaScript into CCSS/UCSS content.

The Gutenverse plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the 's' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.6 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. Specifically, the `render_content()` method in `class-search-result-title.php` outputs the value of `get_query_var('s')` directly into the page HTML without applying `esc_html()` or any other escaping function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages via a crafted URL that execute if a user clicks the link, provided the `gutenverse/search-result-title` block is present on the site's search results template.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the getLiveValues functions tagid parameter due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the getLiveValues functions sn parameter due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the ssoabstractservice due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the userinfo endpoint due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities allow attackers to exploit a user's authenticated session to forge cross-site requests, inducing the execution of unintended operations such as tampering with configuration data.

The Web-based Management allows a remote low privileged Engineer user to install additional APPs on the device downloaded from the PLCnext Store without implementing any data verification mechanism, leading to the capability for an Engineer user to reach arbitrary code execution with root privileges on the PLC device. A successful exploitation may allow to install a manipulated APP package, potentially impacting integrity and availability of the PLCnext Control.